![](pixel.gif)
![Home page button](Assets/BtnHomePageGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Sponsors button](Assets/BtnSponsorsGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Site map button](Assets/BtnSiteMapGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Search button](Assets/BtnSearchGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Contact us button](Assets/BtnContactUsGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Solar data button](Assets/BtnSolarDataGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![About our data button](Assets/BtnAboutOurDataGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Monitoring stations button](Assets/BtnMonitoringStationsGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Instruments button](Assets/BtnInstrumentsGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Software tools button](Assets/BtnSoftwareToolsGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Educational material button](Assets/BtnEducationalMaterialGray.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
![Publications button](Assets/BtnPublicationsGray.gif) |
![](pixel.gif) |
![](pixel.gif)
Measuring diffuse irradiance with a
shade disk
![](pixel.gif)
Diffuse irradiance refers to all the solar
radiation coming from the sky except for solar radiation coming directly from the
sun and the circumsolar irradiance within approximately three degrees of the sun.
Measurement of diffuse radiation is difficult because
one needs to shade the pyranometer from the direct normal and the circumsolar irradiance.
Fortunately automatic trackers exist that perform such functions.
(See a photo of a Kipp and Zonen 2AP tracker
in Eugene).
At first glance the accuracy of the reading appears
to be limited only by the absolute accuracy of the pyranometer. If a pyranometer has an
absolute accuracy of four percent, one would think that the diffuse values should be
accurate to within ±4%.
Unfortunately, other factors come into play. On
clear days, the diffuse readings are typically under 100 watts per square meter.
Therefore, any offset error can have a significant effect. The PSP sensor radiates to
the sky and this give the sensor a 10 to 20 watts per square meter offset that is a
large source of error for the diffuse measurement if it is not corrected.
![](pixel.gif)
Explanation of the offset caused by the
radiation of the sensor to the sky.
![](pixel.gif)
The PSP is a thermopile based pyranometer that
has a black disk at the center attached to one side of the thermopile. The other side
is connected to the heavy base of the pyranometer. The temperature difference between
the black disk and the body of the pyranometer is the source of the voltage difference
that generates the output from the sensor. The black disk is also a good radiator of
infrared radiation and it radiates to the sky. This is the source of the negative five
to ten watts per square meter values measure for horizontal PSPs that are observed
during the night.
In our data we average the nighttime values and
subtract them from the daytime values. Unfortunately, the radiation to the sky is greater
in the day when the temperature of the sensor is greatest. It is very difficult to
measure the effect of this radiation to the sky, although there is work being done on
this problem elsewhere. To help evaluate the problem locally, we mounted a disk shaded
Schenk pyranometer next to a disk shaded PSP.
The Schenk is a star type pyranometer that has
alternating black and white wedges. The output of the instrument is based on measurements
of the temperature difference between the black and white wedges. The black and white
wedges both should radiate equally to the sky. This is born out by nighttime
measurements that show no offset and hence an equal amount of radiation to the
sky.
The figure below shows the comparison of the
PSP and the Schenk data. During the morning and evening hours when the offset should
approximate the nighttime offset, the values of the diffuse reading from the two
instruments are about the same. During the middle of the day, the difference between
the two instruments is about eight to ten watts per square meter. It is difficult to
say for sure the exact cause of this difference, but the difference is similar
to the re-radiation offset found elsewhere.
![Graph of
Schenk Star vs. Eppley PSP](Assets/GraphSchenkVsPSP.gif)
The examination of this radiation factor was a
result of test and modeling efforts associated with the ARM program. In 2000,
Ibrahim Reda of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and colleagues are
publishing a paper on their finding. Understanding this small effect of radiating to
the sky may not seem important, but in the long term it will likely lead to better
instrument design and more accurate solar resource estimates.
![](pixel.gif)
![Image map links to top of page and home page](Assets/ImgMapFooter.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
© 2022, UO Solar Radiation Monitoring
Laboratory.
Last
revised: March 22, 2022.
![](pixel.gif)
![](pixel.gif)
Home page URL: solardata.uoregon.edu |